Gage: Oho! Is it? Now this is an interesting question. The short answer is – no. However, the short answer is also yes. Let me explain.
Trust is an interesting concept. There are many different kinds of trust. I could enumerate them in detail, but I think I know the kind you mean. You are referring to the trust between lovers – the trust which comes with deep affection and unconditional love, the willingness to believe in the other and one’s commitment to the other, utterly outside and beyond all reason; and the unshakeable confidence that this feeling is reciprocated to its fullest extent. In this particular case, you wonder if I have difficulty finding someone to whom I am comfortable submitting sexually without fear that they will – “take things too far,” so to speak.
The question is meaningless because this kind of trust is alien to me. For all the emotions I may experience which revolve around another human being, I cannot for the life of me dredge up anything even remotely similar to what I have just described – and I have tried. It is not that I am unwilling to commit or reluctant to share myself, but that trust in this sense is something of which I am fundamentally incapable.
The upset of the emotional wellbeing or stability of any individual causes cascades of problems in their ability to think rationally and even sometimes in their physical health. This is true for any sentient being, whether or not they admit it. Housing one’s own stability and self-worth within another is like testing the depth of an unknown river with both feet. How, I wonder, could any sane, thinking man or woman invest themselves so heavily in something they can never truly control? And if they could – why? Why take that risk? Please do not misunderstand me here. I am not being deliberately eristic. I find this genuinely incomprehensible.
Let me illustrate what I mean by a very concrete example. One of the greatest strengths of the people of the Qun (which ought to be separated and preserved from the rest of their preposterous, fanatical religion) is the uncompromising solidity of every individual. Every Qunari knows his place, knows what he must be doing at all times and knows what only distracts him and must be avoided or destroyed. This, and no other single concept or nexus of concepts from their idiotic philosophy, is the reason the Qunari represent such an unyielding bastion of power in northern Thedas.
The idea of relying so heavily on some entity outside myself for my emotional stability – and conversely, of some other entity relying so heavily on me for its stability – this is utterly contradictory to the way I think. In a vacuum, one can and must rely on only one thing, and that is one’s own power. Everything else, beneficial or malignant, is secondary and must be dealt with as such. To think or act otherwise is the nadir of insanity.
In a given dynamic between myself and a partner, I submit to their aggression or their demands because it gives me pleasure to do so. It thrills me to watch an individual exert their power over another who seems very much helpless to fight back, even more so if that ostensibly helpless individual is myself. Now you might say, “But isn’t that just what you’ve just said is insanity – allowing another’s power to come before your own?” No, and I will tell you why not.
Every sapient being acts under restraint for the majority of their lives: in a manner of speaking, we leash ourselves in “polite” or “civilized” company because our societies function around individuals who remain in control of themselves. We refrain from exploring our passions to their utmost depths because we must in order for our daily lives to operate as “normal,” and our prosperity is dependent on this notion of normalcy. Similarly, we leash ourselves in private because we are so used to remaining leashed in public that we are unsure of how to be any other way; and even if we realized how to do it, we would be afraid. This fear is a perfectly normal consequence of our civilization and the constellation of values that is constructed around us from the moment we are born. However, that does not mean we should submit to it or allow it to constrain us when we are alone with ourselves – or with another who is similarly unbound.
I have mentioned that one’s own power must always come first. This is inviolable, but there is no shame or danger to oneself in helping another if one’s own power is not threatened by doing so. Why should there be? Collaboration is the foundation of society. That is what “society” means. Thus to help another towards unleashing him- or herself and achieving the truest expression of their power is a worthy endeavour, insofar it does not undermine one’s own.
This is why the short answer to the question of trust in the context of my sexual appetites is no. Anyone can unleash themselves as I have described, given the right encouragement. Any individual who is capable of doing so is beautiful to me, unequivocally. I enjoy it because I am fulfilling the other’s expression of power; I am their object to do with as they wish, and I will allow them as much license as they can achieve… unless I am genuinely threatened. Fortunately, I rarely am. I may be submitting to another and allowing them to use my body for any number of personal depravities of theirs, but I am never, ever defenceless.
This is also why the short answer to the aforementioned question is yes. An individual who is truly capable, with help or without, of casting off all the chains of social convention that hobble them and embracing their own nature with true, honest, joyful abandon – this is a rare individual. They are difficult to find.
I count myself extraordinarily lucky that I have had the pleasure of finding three such individuals in my lifetime thus far. One is the Tevinter magister, Andronicus; one was a Rivaini seeress by the name of Tangwen; and the third is the Warden-Commander of Ferelden, Eingana Tabris.